The corn market in Mexico: from the perspective of the industrial economy and the transaction costs
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5377/ribcc.v3i5.5940Keywords:
Corn market, Institutional economics, Transaction costs, Market failuresAbstract
The objective of the present investigation is to show the role that the institutions play in strategic markets for the countries, in this case the maize market in Mexico. It begins with a review of the background, essentially after NAFTA's entry into Mexico. Subsequently the subject is approached from the great theories that cover the institutions to be able to explain factors that have made the corn market continue to operate in Mexico. Explaining the current way of operating the market by studying transaction costs, and therefore market failures. Concluding with the revision of the impulse that has had the production the rural institutions through some mechanisms such as the production by contract in the rural environment.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Akerlof, G. A. (1970). The market for 'lemons': Qualitative uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84: 488-500.
https://doi.org/10.2307/1879431
Arrow, K. J. (1974). The Limits of Organization. New York, NY: W. W. Norton and Company, ISBN 9780393093230.
Arrow, K. J. (1971). Essays in the Theory of Risk-Bearing. New York, NY: North-Holland Publishing Company, ISBN-10: 0841020019.
Camiro Pérez, M. A., Altamirano Cárdenas, R., & Rojas Herrera, J. J. (2009). Retos del crédito agrícola: estudio de caso de la intermediación financiera en el sur de Sonora, México. Región y sociedad, 21(46), 53-78.
https://doi.org/10.22198/rys.2009.46.a477
Coase, R. H. (1988). The Firm, the Market and the Law. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, vol 1, ISBN: 0-226-11100-8.
Coase, R. H. (1960). The problem of social cost. Journal of Law and Economics, 3: 1-44.
https://doi.org/10.1086/466560
Eakin, H., Perales, H., Appendini, K., & Sweeney, S. (2014). Selling maize in mexico: The persistence of peasant farming in an era of global markets. Development and Change, 45(1), 133-155.
https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12074
El Economista. (2014). Importancia y retos actuales del maíz desde Jalisco para México II. Recuperado de http://eleconomista.com.mx/columnas/agro- negocios/2014/04/01/importancia-retos-actuales-maiz-jalisco-mexico-ii (MAYO, 2017)
FAO. (1993). El maíz en la nutrición humana. Recuperado de: http://www.fao.org/docrep/T0395S/T0395S02.htm#Capitulo%201%20Introducci% F3n (Marzo de 2017). Checarlo de las fechas
FIRA. (2016). Quienes somos. Recuperado de: https://www.fira.gob.mx (Mayo, 2017).
FIRA (2015). Panorama Agroalimentario. Recuperado de: http://www.gob.mx/cms/uploads/attachment/file/200637/Panorama_Agroalimentario_Ma_
García Salazar, J. A. (2002). Política arancelaria y protección del mercado de maíz en México. Momento Económico, (123), 12-25. doi:http://www.ejournal.unam.mx/cuadros2.php?r=17&liga=1
Fox, J. and L. Haight (2010). Subsidios para la desigualdad: Las políticas públicas del maíz en México a partir del libre comercio. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars.
Varian, H. R. (2010). Microeconomía: Un enfoque actual. Barcelona, España: Antoni Bosch, editor.
INEGI (2014). Encuesta Nacional Agropecuaria 2014. Recuperado de: http://www.inegi.org.mx/est/contenidos/proyectos/encuestas/agropecuarias/ena/ena2 014/. (Mayo 2017).
INEGI (2007). Censo Agrícola, Ganadero y Forestal 2007. Recuperado de: http://www.inegi.org.mx/est/contenidos/proyectos/Agro/ca2007/Resultados_Agricol a/ (Mayo,2017).
Mahoney, J. T. (2012). Economic foundations of strategy. Illinois, USA: SAGE
Mahoney, J. T. and Rajendran Pandian, J. (1992). The resource-based view within the conversation of strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 13: 363-380.
https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250130505
Sagarpa Jalisco (2015), Maíz grano, blanco y amarillo. Sagarpa Jalisco https://www.jalisco.gob.mx/es/noticias-referencias/sagarpa
The New York Time (2017), México está listo para usar el maíz a su favor en las negociaciones del TLCAN, https://www.nytimes.com/es/2017/04/03/espanol/america-latina/mexico-maiz-renegociacion-tlcan.html
García S., J. A., y G. W. Williams. 2004. Evaluación de la política comercial respecto al mercado de maíz. El Trimestre Económico LXXI(1)(281): 169-213
Vargas Lozano, G (2014), Filosofía ¿para qué? Desafíos de la filosofía para el siglo XXI, México: Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, 154p. ISBN: 978-607-7957-34-8
Minutos. (2017). Productores de Tamaulipas aseguran venta de cosechas de maíz y sorgo. Recuperado de http://www.20minutos.com.mx/noticia/203731/0/productores-de- tamaulipas-aseguran-venta-de-cosechas-de-maiz-y-sorgo/#xtor=AD-1&xts=513356. (Marzo, 2017).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Iberoamericana de Bioeconomía y Cambio Climático
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright © 2024 Rev. iberoam. bioecon. climate change. National Autonomous University of Nicaragua León (UNAN-León), Area of Knowledge of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences / Specific Area of Agroecology / Center for Research in Bioeconomy and Climate Change (CIByCC)..
EDITORIAL
e-ISSN
COPYRIGHT
This work is licensed under a Licencia Internacional 
