Reflections to measure the socioeconomic impact of the food production bonus

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5377/ribcc.v3i6.5950

Keywords:

Methodological design, Qualitative research, Kind of explanatory research, Method instruments, Sample

Abstract

The present study is a review of the methodological design to measure the socio-economic impact of the Productive Bonus program. So, when study a methodology the first thing the researcher finds is the definition of the type of research you want to perform. Choice of type of research will determine the steps to follow in the study, its techniques and methods that can be used in it. In general, it determines all research approach influencing instruments, and even the way how the collected data is analyzed to measure an impact such as the Bonus Productive. So, the point of the research types in an investigation is going to constitute an important step in the methodology, as this will determine the focus of it. This can be divided into two main types of Field or from laboratory. Which in turn can be classified into four main types: Exploratory Studies: Also known as a pilot study, are those which are investigated for the first time or are very few studies investigated.

They are also used to identify a problem. Studies: Describe the facts as they are observed. Correlation Studies: Study the relationships between dependent variables independent, the correlation between two variables is studied. Studies Explanatory: This type of study seeks the why of the facts, establishing cause-effect relationships. But in this case we will be addressing all the sections that involve the methodological design of the research, qualitative and the aspects that refer to it.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

A. D. Mondragon-Lainez, National Autonomous University of Nicaragua, León. Nicaragua

Researcher CUR-Somotillo. Master of Education and Rural Development

C. A. Zúniga-Gonzalez, Nacional Autonomous University of Nicaragua, Leon. Nicaragua

Director of the Center for Research in Agricultural Sciences and Applied Economics. School of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences. Agroecology Department.

References

Atkinson, H. C., & Begg, E. J. (1988). The binding of drugs to major human milk whey proteins. British journal of clinical pharmacology, 26(1), 107-109.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2125.1988.tb03373.x

Cajide Val, J. (1992). El desarrollo intelectual en matemáticas: perspectivas desde una experimentación. Educadores: Revista de la Federación Española de Religiosos de Enseñanza, 34(161), 67-73.

CABALLO, V. E. (1993). Manual de evaluación y entrenamiento de las habilidades sociales.

Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. Handbook of qualitative research, 2(163-194), 105.

Hernández, R., Fernández, C. B., & Baptista, L. P.(2003). Metodología de la Investigación, (Vol. 3).

Hernández Sampieri, R., Fernández Collado, C., & Baptista Lucio, P. (1991). Metodología de la Investigación. 2da. Edición. Editorial Mc Graw Hill.

Hernández, R., & Fernández, C. B. (2003) Metodología de la investigación. Editorial Mc Graw Hill. México.

Hernández, R., Fernández, C., & Baptista, P. (2006). Metodología de la investigación.

Guba, E. G. (1990). The paradigm dialog. In Alternative paradigms conference, mar, 1989, indiana u, school of education, san francisco, ca, us. Sage Publications, Inc.

Jakobson, R. (1963). Essais de linguistique générale.

Kuhn, T. S. (1977). The Essential Tension. Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226217239.001.0001

Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry Vol. 75 Sage. Beverly Hills, CA.

Méndez, I., Namihira, D., Moreno, L., & Sosa, C. (2001). El protocolo de investigación. México DF: Trillas.

Padrón, J. (1998). La estructura de los procesos de investigación. Revista educación y ciencias humanas, 9(17), 33-45.

Paz, M. (2003). Investigación cualitativa en educación. Fundamentos y tradiciones. Editorial Mcgraw Hill. México DF.

Pita Fernández, S., & Pértegas Díaz, S. (2002). Investigación cuantitativa y cualitativa. Cad aten primaria, 9(76-8).

Pérez Andrés, C. (2000). ¿ Deben estar las técnicas de consenso incluidas entre las técnicas de investigación cualitativa?. Revista Española de Salud Pública, 74(4), 00-00.

https://doi.org/10.1590/S1135-57272000000400001

Rodríguez, J. M. (2011). Métodos de investigación cualitativa. Revista Silogismo, 4(8), 11-11.

Sampieri, R. H., Collado, C. F., Lucio, P. B., & Pérez, M. D. L. (1998). Metodología de la investigación (Vol. 1). McGraw-Hill.

Valles, M. S. (2000). Técnicas cualitativas de investigación social. Madrid: Sintesis Editorial.

Published

2017-09-30

How to Cite

Mondragon-Lainez, A. D., & Zúniga-Gonzalez, C. A. (2017). Reflections to measure the socioeconomic impact of the food production bonus. Rev. Iberoam. Bioecon. Cambio Clim., 3(6), 769–781. https://doi.org/10.5377/ribcc.v3i6.5950

Issue

Section

Review article

Categories

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 > >>