Response in the growth of oreochromis niloticus juveniles fed with two types of diet: experimental at 28% protein (based on banana peel and soy), vs. commercial at 28%

Authors

  • Juan Caballeros National Autonomous University of Nicaragua, León
  • Julio Alberto Espinoza R. National Autonomous University of Nicaragua, León
  • Francisco Santamaría National Autonomous University of Nicaragua, León
  • Evenor Martinez G. National Autonomous University of Nicaragua, León

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5377/universitas.v6i1.13688

Keywords:

Tilapia Farming applying based food banana peel flour, Breeding Tilapia, Soybean flour

Abstract

Response in the growth of Oreochromis niloticus juveniles fed with two types of diet: Experimental at 28% protein (based on banana peel and soy), vs. Commercial at 28%. To determine which treatment obtained the highest growth, physical-chemical factors (Dissolved Oxygen, Temperature and pH) and population parameters (Accumulated Growth, Survival and Feed Conversion Factor) were taken. Collecting these data for 25 days where the Tilapia Oreochromis niloticus had an initial weight of 7.9 gr in both treatments. According to the results obtained in the experiment, the treatment with commercial feed at 28% protein acquired a final growth of 13.1 g, obtaining an average of 10.5 g, instead the treatment with experimental feed at 28% protein based on banana peel flour. and soybeans acquired a final weight of 10.2 gr, obtaining an average of 8.97 gr. The commercial treatment at 28% protein gained more size and biomass because they assimilated the food in a greater way and in less time, in contrast to the treatment with experimental food at 28% protein based on banana and soybean peel flour. gained little biomass and less size since they took time to assimilate and get used to the food that was put to experimental, when applying the statistical analysis it was found that p> 0.05 that the growth of the Tilapias Oreochromis niloticus there is a significant difference because between treatments There is a big difference between the weights.

 

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Juan Caballeros, National Autonomous University of Nicaragua, León

Research group in:Marine and Aquaculture Research Laboratory (LIMA), León, NicaraguaFaculty of science and technology

Julio Alberto Espinoza R., National Autonomous University of Nicaragua, León

Research group in:Marine and Aquaculture Research Laboratory (LIMA), León, NicaraguaFaculty of science and technology

Francisco Santamaría, National Autonomous University of Nicaragua, León

Research group in:Marine and Aquaculture Research Laboratory (LIMA), León, NicaraguaFaculty of science and technology

Evenor Martinez G., National Autonomous University of Nicaragua, León

Research group in:Marine and Aquaculture Research Laboratory (LIMA), León, NicaraguaFaculty of science and technology

References

Alamilla T.H 2001. Cultivo de Tilapia. ZOE Tecno-Campo. México. 12 pp. Disponibles en: www.zoetecnocampo.com/ documentos/tilapia.htm

Cantor A.F. 2007. Manual de producción de tilapia. Secretaría de Desarrollo Rural del Estado de Puebla. México - Pueblo. 135pp. (En línea). Disponible en: http://es.scribd.com/doc/26642997/Curso-de-Cultivo-de-Tilapia

Morgan, P.R. (1972) Causes of mortality in the endemic tilapia of Lake Chilwa (Malawi). Hydrobiologia 40, 101-119. [Consultado en Junio del 2013] Disponible en: http://www.readcube.com/articles/10.1007/BF00123596

https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00123596

López Bladimir y Cruz Luis. 2011. Escuela Politécnica del Ejército. Departamento de Ciencias de la Vida. Carrera de Inge niería en Ciencias Agropecuarias. Santo Domingo. Ecuador. 109 pp.

Randall, D.J, et, al (1989) Urea excretion as a strategy for survival in a fish living in a very alkaline environment. Nature 337, 165-166. [Consultado en Junio del 2013] .Disponible en: http://www.dbbe.fcen.uba.ar/old/materias/ fac/LetterExcretor(2).pdf

https://doi.org/10.1038/337165a0

Ramos F, Triminio S, Meyer D, Barrientos A (2006). Determinación de los costos del cultivo de tilapia a pequeña y mediana escala. Zamorano Honduras 26 pp. Disponible en: http://www.pdacrsp.oregonstate.edu/pubs/featured titles/DeterminacionMeyer007.pdf

Saavedra, M. A. (2003), Introducción al Cultivo de Tilapia. Cordinación de Acuicultura, Departamento de Ciencias Am- bientales y Agrarias, Facultad de Ciencias, Tecnología y Ambiente. Universidad Centroamericana. Managua Nica- ragua. Mayo, 2003. 12 pp. Disponible en: http://www.slideshare.net/Ir18mx/introduccion-al-cultivo-de-tilapia

Saavedra M. A. (2006), manejo del cultivo de tilapias. Managua, Nicaragua. 4 pp. Disponible en: http://www.pdf.usaid,gov/pdf docs/pnadk649.pdf

Popma, T.J. y B.W. Green.(1990).Sex Reversal of Tilapia in Earthen Ponds International Center of Aquaculture, Auburn University, Alabama, USA.15 pp. Excelente resumen de los procedimientos útiles en producir masivamen- te alevines de tilapia y en realizar el tratamiento con MT

Published

2015-07-01

How to Cite

Caballeros, J., Espinoza R., . J. A., Santamaría, F., & Martinez G., E. (2015). Response in the growth of oreochromis niloticus juveniles fed with two types of diet: experimental at 28% protein (based on banana peel and soy), vs. commercial at 28%. UNIVERSITAS (LEÓN): SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL OF THE UNAN-LEÓN, 6(1), 112–120. https://doi.org/10.5377/universitas.v6i1.13688

Issue

Section

Articles