Socioeconomic factors and the use of contraceptive methods in women of childbearing age in Nicaragua

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5377/aes.v1i2.11448

Keywords:

women of childbearing age (WCBA), contraception, econometric model

Abstract

The woman's ability to decide if and when to get pregnant has a direct impact on her health and socioeconomic welfare, (Caudillo, Benavides, Valdez, Flores, & Hernández, 2017, p.52). This study analyzes the socioeconomic factors that determine the use of contraceptive methods in Nicaraguan women of childbearing age, using the Nicaraguan Demographic and Health Survey (ENDESA, 2011). The type of research is quantitative, correlational and non-experimental and the econometric analysis is based on the logistic model for the dichotomous variable use and non-use of any contraceptive method. The results of the research explain that by 2011, 59.8% of women of childbearing age used at least one contraceptive method and the most used was the Bilateral Tubal Occlusion BTO or Ligation (21.3%), followed by the contraceptive injection ( 20.9%) and the contraceptive pill (8.2%). By age structure, in the age range of 15-20 has the lowest percentage of contraceptive use with 30.7%, however this value increases to 61.4% in the age range of 21-29 to 73.3% in women aged 30-36. A relevant fact is that 6 out of 10 women of childbearing age have been pregnant at least once at the age of 21. Regarding the model, it was found that access to a health center to obtain the contraceptive method does not guarantee its use. The characteristics related to age, region, area of ​​residence, ethnicity, having ever been pregnant, having had sexual intercourse in the last 12 months, use of a condom in the first sexual intercourse and having a partner all meet the expected theoretical relationship regarding the use of contraceptive methods in women of childbearing age. Having been pregnant (98.2%) and having a partner (69.7%) have the highest marginal effects.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anjum, Sh., Durgawale, PM. y Shinde, M. (2014). Epidemiological correlates of use of contraceptives methods and appraisal of health education on status of knowledge and practices among married woman. International Journal of Science and Research, 203-10.

Anjum, Sh., y Shinde M. (2014). Knowledge of contraceptives methods and appraisal of health education among married woman. International Journal of Science and Research, marzo, 584-90.

Caudillo, L., Benavides, R., Harrison, T., Onofre, D., López, F. y Márquez, M. (2016). Modelo de Conducta Anticonceptiva en Mujeres Jóvenes: Un Estudio con Métodos Mixtos. Nure inv., 1-8.

Caudillo, L., Benavides, R., Valdez, C., Flores, M. y Hernández, M. (2017). Modelo de Conducta Anticonceptiva en Mujeres Jóvenes: Teoría de Situación Específica. Index de Enfermería, 52-56.

CODENI, (2017). Embarazos en Adolescentes. CODENI. Recuperado el 29 de diciembre de 2019 (http://www.codeni.org.ni/proteccion-especial/embarazos-en-adolescentes/embarazos-en-adolescentes/).

Folch, C., Álvarez, J., Casabona, J., Brotons, M. y Castellsagué, X. (2015). Determinantes de las conductas sexuales de riesgo en jóvenes de cataluña. Revista Española Salud Pública, 471-85.

https://doi.org/10.4321/S1135-57272015000500005

Hernández Sampieri, R., Fernández Collado, C., y Baptista Lucio, P. (2014). Metodología de la investigación: Roberto Hernández Sampieri, Carlos Fernández Collado y Pilar Baptista Lucio (6a. ed. --.). México D.F.: McGraw-Hill.

Institut Marquès, (2017). Las 5 etapas de la vida fértil de la mujer. Institut Marquès. Recuperado el 16 de septiembre de 2019 (https://institutomarques.com/noticias/noticias-2017/las-5-etapas-la-vida-fertil-la-mujer/).

OMS (2018). "Planificación familiar". WHO. Recuperado el 23 de octubre de 2019 (https://www.who.int/es/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/family-planning-contraception).

ONU Mujeres (1995). Declaración y Plataforma de Acción de Beijing

Paraíso, B., Maldonado M., López, A. y Cañete, M. (2013) Anticoncepción en la mujer inmigrante: Influencia de los aspectos socioculturales en la elección del método anticonceptivo. Sociedad española de médicos de atencion primaria (SEMERGEN), abril 11, 440-44.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semerg.2013.01.016

Peláez, J. (2016). El uso de métodos anticonceptivos en la adolescencia. Revista Cubana de Obstetricia y Ginecología, 42(1) Recuperado en 30 de noviembre de 2020, de http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0138-600X2016000100011&lng=es&tlng=es.

The Associated Press. (2019). Nicaragua debe atender el embarazo precoz y la violencia sexual, según UNICEF. El Nuevo Heraldo. Recuperado el 29 de diciembre de 2019 (https://www.elnuevoherald.com/noticias/mundo/america-latina/article228618049.html).

Santiso, R., Ward, V. y Bertrand, J. (2015). Planificación Familiar en Nicaragua Logros de 50 años.

UNICEF (2002). Adolescencia, una etapa fundamental Recuperado el 22 de noviembre de 2019 (https://www.unicef.org/pub_adolescence_sp.pdf)

UNICEF (2009). Estado mundial de la infancia 2009. Salud Materna y Neonatal

UNFPA (2013). El bono demográfico en Nicaragua: Una oportunidad para el desarrollo.

UNFPA (2016). Salud Materna. Recuperado el 22 de noviembre de 2019 (https://www.unfpa.org/es/salud-materna?page=3)

Yago, T., y Tomás, C. (2014). Variables sociodemográficas relacionadas con embarazos no planificados en jóvenes de 13 a 24 años. Revista Española Salud Pública, 395-406.

https://doi.org/10.4321/S1135-57272014000300009

Published

2020-12-30

How to Cite

Avilés Peralta, Y., Sánchez Quintero, M., & Valiente Gutiérrez, O. (2020). Socioeconomic factors and the use of contraceptive methods in women of childbearing age in Nicaragua. Scientific Journal "Notes on Economy and Society&Quot;, 1(2), 67–78. https://doi.org/10.5377/aes.v1i2.11448

Issue

Section

Artículos